Internet Marketing Companies

March 4, 2010

Cleaning Franchise

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 12:58 pm

With the NBA's trade deadline just under a week away, rumors of potential trades are seemingly increasing by the hour. 

One team at the forefront of several different trade winds is the Washington Wizards.

The Wizards, at a dismal 17-33 entering the All-Star Break, possess several different tradable parts that are clearly appealing to various teams throughout the league.

After entering the season with high hopes, Washington's already-slim playoff aspirations were all but derailed by the gun fiasco involving franchise centerpiece Gilbert Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittenton.

The season-long struggles of the 2010 edition of the Wizards have sparked several rumors about the team's core of talent—Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, and Brendan Haywood—potentially being shipped out of town in an effort to rebuild from the ground up.

So, if the Wiz do decide to blow it up and start over, where will they send those guys?

Let's run through a few possible scenarios.

 

Scenario No. 1: Washington trades Butler and Jamison to Boston for Ray Allen, Brian Scalabrine, and JR Giddens

If there's any validity to this rumor (first reported by Yahoo! Sports via HoopsHype.com), it would be a sure-fire signal that the Wizards are content with bringing back a package full of nothing but expiring deals.

With Allen, Scalabrine, and Giddens all set to expire after this season, the Wizards would be cleaning $24 million off their books for next season, allowing them some breathing room for potential spending sometime down the road.

For Boston, this trade would give them a tiny bit more youth and some much-needed depth on the frontline.

Butler would likely slide in and become the starting off-guard in Allen's place, and Jamison would return to the sixth man role in which he flourished in Dallas several years back (he won Sixth Man of the Year in 2004 with the Mavericks). 

The key to this trade would be the Celtics' willingness to eat more salary in an effort to possibly win another championship.

In my opinion, this would be a Pau Gasol-style fleecing at the hands of the Wizards, and Boston should jump at the opportunity, if it's really there.

 

Scenario No. 2: Washington trades Butler and Haywood to Houston; Houston trades Tracy McGrady to New York; New York trades Al Harrington to Washington

While there would have to be more thrown in to make this work financially, this is the core of this potential swap.

Initially reported Thursday (also by Yahoo! Sports), this trade would satisfy all three parties involved.

Houston gets some much-needed size up front with Haywood and a perimeter player that can create his own shot with Butler.

This would also help the Rockets in their push toward the playoffs this season.

New York gets the biggest expiring contract out there (McGrady at $23 million), and Washington still gets expiring contracts with Harrington and whoever else the Knicks would send.

Win. Win. Win.

 

Scenario No. 3: Washington trades Jamison to Cleveland for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

If saving money is Washington's primary concern leading up to the deadline, I could see something like this happening in the 11th hour, when all other options have been exhausted.

The Cavs, in an attempt to bolster their roster for another run at the title, would get the man they've wanted all along, and Washington would again receive an expiring contract, this time worth $11 million.

While Cleveland has been hesitant to trade Ilgauskas, essentially their insurance policy for Shaquille O'Neal, this is a deal that they would not be able to refuse in the end.

 

Scenario No. 4: Washington trades Butler, Haywood, and Mike Miller to Dallas for Josh Howard and Erick Dampier

Howard and Dampier are both expiring contracts, so, again, Washington would have to be willing to make a trade without getting any young talent in return.

The only really appealing young player on Dallas' roster is 21-year-old rookie guard Rodrigue Beaubois, and it's been reported that Mark Cuban does not want to give him up.

The question for this trade is: Does Dallas like Butler enough to take on his salary of $10 million for next season?

Howard has been inconsistent all season long for the Mavs, and they've been interested in trading him for quite some time now.

This would likely make the Mavericks a bit more talented headed into the stretch run for the playoffs.

 

Scenario No. 5: Washington receives Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, and Yakhouba Diawara; Chicago receives Quentin Richardson, Michael Beasley, Dorrell Wright, and Brendan Haywood; Miami receives Caron Butler, Kirk Hinrich, and Fabricio Oberto

This one is something I cooked up using the ultra-addictive ESPN NBA Trade Machine.

Here, the Wizards receive about $18 million in expiring deals, highlighted by the coveted Tyrus Thomas.

It gives them a couple of months to try Thomas out for themselves and see if there is something there that they may be interested in long-term.

The Bulls will immediately add four solid rotation players that can step in and contribute, including Michael Beasley.

Beasley is similar to Thomas in that they are both highly touted prospects that have underachieved a bit so far during their brief careers. 

Top-to-bottom, this makes Chicago more talented for this season while also saving them money for this summer, as all three players other than Beasley are expiring after this season.

The Heat receive a top-notch scorer to pair with Dwyane Wade, as well as a solid backup guard in Hinrich that can play both backcourt positions effectively.

This surrounds Wade with some more talent, and, as both Butler and Hinrich are under contract through at least next season, could give Wade more incentive to re-up with the Heat after this season.

This article can also be found at NBA Soup.

With the NBA's trade deadline just under a week away, rumors of potential trades are seemingly increasing by the hour. 

One team at the forefront of several different trade winds is the Washington Wizards.

The Wizards, at a dismal 17-33 entering the All-Star Break, possess several different tradable parts that are clearly appealing to various teams throughout the league.

After entering the season with high hopes, Washington's already-slim playoff aspirations were all but derailed by the gun fiasco involving franchise centerpiece Gilbert Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittenton.

The season-long struggles of the 2010 edition of the Wizards have sparked several rumors about the team's core of talent—Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, and Brendan Haywood—potentially being shipped out of town in an effort to rebuild from the ground up.

So, if the Wiz do decide to blow it up and start over, where will they send those guys?

Let's run through a few possible scenarios.

 

Scenario No. 1: Washington trades Butler and Jamison to Boston for Ray Allen, Brian Scalabrine, and JR Giddens

If there's any validity to this rumor (first reported by Yahoo! Sports via HoopsHype.com), it would be a sure-fire signal that the Wizards are content with bringing back a package full of nothing but expiring deals.

With Allen, Scalabrine, and Giddens all set to expire after this season, the Wizards would be cleaning $24 million off their books for next season, allowing them some breathing room for potential spending sometime down the road.

For Boston, this trade would give them a tiny bit more youth and some much-needed depth on the frontline.

Butler would likely slide in and become the starting off-guard in Allen's place, and Jamison would return to the sixth man role in which he flourished in Dallas several years back (he won Sixth Man of the Year in 2004 with the Mavericks). 

The key to this trade would be the Celtics' willingness to eat more salary in an effort to possibly win another championship.

In my opinion, this would be a Pau Gasol-style fleecing at the hands of the Wizards, and Boston should jump at the opportunity, if it's really there.

 

Scenario No. 2: Washington trades Butler and Haywood to Houston; Houston trades Tracy McGrady to New York; New York trades Al Harrington to Washington

While there would have to be more thrown in to make this work financially, this is the core of this potential swap.

Initially reported Thursday (also by Yahoo! Sports), this trade would satisfy all three parties involved.

Houston gets some much-needed size up front with Haywood and a perimeter player that can create his own shot with Butler.

This would also help the Rockets in their push toward the playoffs this season.

New York gets the biggest expiring contract out there (McGrady at $23 million), and Washington still gets expiring contracts with Harrington and whoever else the Knicks would send.

Win. Win. Win.

 

Scenario No. 3: Washington trades Jamison to Cleveland for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

If saving money is Washington's primary concern leading up to the deadline, I could see something like this happening in the 11th hour, when all other options have been exhausted.

The Cavs, in an attempt to bolster their roster for another run at the title, would get the man they've wanted all along, and Washington would again receive an expiring contract, this time worth $11 million.

While Cleveland has been hesitant to trade Ilgauskas, essentially their insurance policy for Shaquille O'Neal, this is a deal that they would not be able to refuse in the end.

 

Scenario No. 4: Washington trades Butler, Haywood, and Mike Miller to Dallas for Josh Howard and Erick Dampier

Howard and Dampier are both expiring contracts, so, again, Washington would have to be willing to make a trade without getting any young talent in return.

The only really appealing young player on Dallas' roster is 21-year-old rookie guard Rodrigue Beaubois, and it's been reported that Mark Cuban does not want to give him up.

The question for this trade is: Does Dallas like Butler enough to take on his salary of $10 million for next season?

Howard has been inconsistent all season long for the Mavs, and they've been interested in trading him for quite some time now.

This would likely make the Mavericks a bit more talented headed into the stretch run for the playoffs.

 

Scenario No. 5: Washington receives Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, and Yakhouba Diawara; Chicago receives Quentin Richardson, Michael Beasley, Dorrell Wright, and Brendan Haywood; Miami receives Caron Butler, Kirk Hinrich, and Fabricio Oberto

This one is something I cooked up using the ultra-addictive ESPN NBA Trade Machine.

Here, the Wizards receive about $18 million in expiring deals, highlighted by the coveted Tyrus Thomas.

It gives them a couple of months to try Thomas out for themselves and see if there is something there that they may be interested in long-term.

The Bulls will immediately add four solid rotation players that can step in and contribute, including Michael Beasley.

Beasley is similar to Thomas in that they are both highly touted prospects that have underachieved a bit so far during their brief careers. 

Top-to-bottom, this makes Chicago more talented for this season while also saving them money for this summer, as all three players other than Beasley are expiring after this season.

The Heat receive a top-notch scorer to pair with Dwyane Wade, as well as a solid backup guard in Hinrich that can play both backcourt positions effectively.

This surrounds Wade with some more talent, and, as both Butler and Hinrich are under contract through at least next season, could give Wade more incentive to re-up with the Heat after this season.

This article can also be found at NBA Soup.

With the NBA's trade deadline just under a week away, rumors of potential trades are seemingly increasing by the hour. 

One team at the forefront of several different trade winds is the Washington Wizards.

The Wizards, at a dismal 17-33 entering the All-Star Break, possess several different tradable parts that are clearly appealing to various teams throughout the league.

After entering the season with high hopes, Washington's already-slim playoff aspirations were all but derailed by the gun fiasco involving franchise centerpiece Gilbert Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittenton.

The season-long struggles of the 2010 edition of the Wizards have sparked several rumors about the team's core of talent—Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, and Brendan Haywood—potentially being shipped out of town in an effort to rebuild from the ground up.

So, if the Wiz do decide to blow it up and start over, where will they send those guys?

Let's run through a few possible scenarios.

 

Scenario No. 1: Washington trades Butler and Jamison to Boston for Ray Allen, Brian Scalabrine, and JR Giddens

If there's any validity to this rumor (first reported by Yahoo! Sports via HoopsHype.com), it would be a sure-fire signal that the Wizards are content with bringing back a package full of nothing but expiring deals.

With Allen, Scalabrine, and Giddens all set to expire after this season, the Wizards would be cleaning $24 million off their books for next season, allowing them some breathing room for potential spending sometime down the road.

For Boston, this trade would give them a tiny bit more youth and some much-needed depth on the frontline.

Butler would likely slide in and become the starting off-guard in Allen's place, and Jamison would return to the sixth man role in which he flourished in Dallas several years back (he won Sixth Man of the Year in 2004 with the Mavericks). 

The key to this trade would be the Celtics' willingness to eat more salary in an effort to possibly win another championship.

In my opinion, this would be a Pau Gasol-style fleecing at the hands of the Wizards, and Boston should jump at the opportunity, if it's really there.

 

Scenario No. 2: Washington trades Butler and Haywood to Houston; Houston trades Tracy McGrady to New York; New York trades Al Harrington to Washington

While there would have to be more thrown in to make this work financially, this is the core of this potential swap.

Initially reported Thursday (also by Yahoo! Sports), this trade would satisfy all three parties involved.

Houston gets some much-needed size up front with Haywood and a perimeter player that can create his own shot with Butler.

This would also help the Rockets in their push toward the playoffs this season.

New York gets the biggest expiring contract out there (McGrady at $23 million), and Washington still gets expiring contracts with Harrington and whoever else the Knicks would send.

Win. Win. Win.

 

Scenario No. 3: Washington trades Jamison to Cleveland for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

If saving money is Washington's primary concern leading up to the deadline, I could see something like this happening in the 11th hour, when all other options have been exhausted.

The Cavs, in an attempt to bolster their roster for another run at the title, would get the man they've wanted all along, and Washington would again receive an expiring contract, this time worth $11 million.

While Cleveland has been hesitant to trade Ilgauskas, essentially their insurance policy for Shaquille O'Neal, this is a deal that they would not be able to refuse in the end.

 

Scenario No. 4: Washington trades Butler, Haywood, and Mike Miller to Dallas for Josh Howard and Erick Dampier

Howard and Dampier are both expiring contracts, so, again, Washington would have to be willing to make a trade without getting any young talent in return.

The only really appealing young player on Dallas' roster is 21-year-old rookie guard Rodrigue Beaubois, and it's been reported that Mark Cuban does not want to give him up.

The question for this trade is: Does Dallas like Butler enough to take on his salary of $10 million for next season?

Howard has been inconsistent all season long for the Mavs, and they've been interested in trading him for quite some time now.

This would likely make the Mavericks a bit more talented headed into the stretch run for the playoffs.

 

Scenario No. 5: Washington receives Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, and Yakhouba Diawara; Chicago receives Quentin Richardson, Michael Beasley, Dorrell Wright, and Brendan Haywood; Miami receives Caron Butler, Kirk Hinrich, and Fabricio Oberto

This one is something I cooked up using the ultra-addictive ESPN NBA Trade Machine.

Here, the Wizards receive about $18 million in expiring deals, highlighted by the coveted Tyrus Thomas.

It gives them a couple of months to try Thomas out for themselves and see if there is something there that they may be interested in long-term.

The Bulls will immediately add four solid rotation players that can step in and contribute, including Michael Beasley.

Beasley is similar to Thomas in that they are both highly touted prospects that have underachieved a bit so far during their brief careers. 

Top-to-bottom, this makes Chicago more talented for this season while also saving them money for this summer, as all three players other than Beasley are expiring after this season.

The Heat receive a top-notch scorer to pair with Dwyane Wade, as well as a solid backup guard in Hinrich that can play both backcourt positions effectively.

This surrounds Wade with some more talent, and, as both Butler and Hinrich are under contract through at least next season, could give Wade more incentive to re-up with the Heat after this season.

This article can also be found at NBA Soup.

With the NBA's trade deadline just under a week away, rumors of potential trades are seemingly increasing by the hour. 

One team at the forefront of several different trade winds is the Washington Wizards.

The Wizards, at a dismal 17-33 entering the All-Star Break, possess several different tradable parts that are clearly appealing to various teams throughout the league.

After entering the season with high hopes, Washington's already-slim playoff aspirations were all but derailed by the gun fiasco involving franchise centerpiece Gilbert Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittenton.

The season-long struggles of the 2010 edition of the Wizards have sparked several rumors about the team's core of talent—Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, and Brendan Haywood—potentially being shipped out of town in an effort to rebuild from the ground up.

So, if the Wiz do decide to blow it up and start over, where will they send those guys?

Let's run through a few possible scenarios.

 

Scenario No. 1: Washington trades Butler and Jamison to Boston for Ray Allen, Brian Scalabrine, and JR Giddens

If there's any validity to this rumor (first reported by Yahoo! Sports via HoopsHype.com), it would be a sure-fire signal that the Wizards are content with bringing back a package full of nothing but expiring deals.

With Allen, Scalabrine, and Giddens all set to expire after this season, the Wizards would be cleaning $24 million off their books for next season, allowing them some breathing room for potential spending sometime down the road.

For Boston, this trade would give them a tiny bit more youth and some much-needed depth on the frontline.

Butler would likely slide in and become the starting off-guard in Allen's place, and Jamison would return to the sixth man role in which he flourished in Dallas several years back (he won Sixth Man of the Year in 2004 with the Mavericks). 

The key to this trade would be the Celtics' willingness to eat more salary in an effort to possibly win another championship.

In my opinion, this would be a Pau Gasol-style fleecing at the hands of the Wizards, and Boston should jump at the opportunity, if it's really there.

 

Scenario No. 2: Washington trades Butler and Haywood to Houston; Houston trades Tracy McGrady to New York; New York trades Al Harrington to Washington

While there would have to be more thrown in to make this work financially, this is the core of this potential swap.

Initially reported Thursday (also by Yahoo! Sports), this trade would satisfy all three parties involved.

Houston gets some much-needed size up front with Haywood and a perimeter player that can create his own shot with Butler.

This would also help the Rockets in their push toward the playoffs this season.

New York gets the biggest expiring contract out there (McGrady at $23 million), and Washington still gets expiring contracts with Harrington and whoever else the Knicks would send.

Win. Win. Win.

 

Scenario No. 3: Washington trades Jamison to Cleveland for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

If saving money is Washington's primary concern leading up to the deadline, I could see something like this happening in the 11th hour, when all other options have been exhausted.

The Cavs, in an attempt to bolster their roster for another run at the title, would get the man they've wanted all along, and Washington would again receive an expiring contract, this time worth $11 million.

While Cleveland has been hesitant to trade Ilgauskas, essentially their insurance policy for Shaquille O'Neal, this is a deal that they would not be able to refuse in the end.

 

Scenario No. 4: Washington trades Butler, Haywood, and Mike Miller to Dallas for Josh Howard and Erick Dampier

Howard and Dampier are both expiring contracts, so, again, Washington would have to be willing to make a trade without getting any young talent in return.

The only really appealing young player on Dallas' roster is 21-year-old rookie guard Rodrigue Beaubois, and it's been reported that Mark Cuban does not want to give him up.

The question for this trade is: Does Dallas like Butler enough to take on his salary of $10 million for next season?

Howard has been inconsistent all season long for the Mavs, and they've been interested in trading him for quite some time now.

This would likely make the Mavericks a bit more talented headed into the stretch run for the playoffs.

 

Scenario No. 5: Washington receives Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, and Yakhouba Diawara; Chicago receives Quentin Richardson, Michael Beasley, Dorrell Wright, and Brendan Haywood; Miami receives Caron Butler, Kirk Hinrich, and Fabricio Oberto

This one is something I cooked up using the ultra-addictive ESPN NBA Trade Machine.

Here, the Wizards receive about $18 million in expiring deals, highlighted by the coveted Tyrus Thomas.

It gives them a couple of months to try Thomas out for themselves and see if there is something there that they may be interested in long-term.

The Bulls will immediately add four solid rotation players that can step in and contribute, including Michael Beasley.

Beasley is similar to Thomas in that they are both highly touted prospects that have underachieved a bit so far during their brief careers. 

Top-to-bottom, this makes Chicago more talented for this season while also saving them money for this summer, as all three players other than Beasley are expiring after this season.

The Heat receive a top-notch scorer to pair with Dwyane Wade, as well as a solid backup guard in Hinrich that can play both backcourt positions effectively.

This surrounds Wade with some more talent, and, as both Butler and Hinrich are under contract through at least next season, could give Wade more incentive to re-up with the Heat after this season.

This article can also be found at NBA Soup.

Anago Dallas - Our franchisees getting ready to clean by anagousa1

existing franchises for sale , franchises for sale

<b>News</b> Of The Day

"I know of no other time where it's been alleged by what is basically a police agency that the governor lied under oath," said NYPIRG's Blair Horner. Asked if he had indeed lied, Gov. David Paterson replied simply: "No." "The…

Blizzard of bad jobs <b>news</b> to hit Friday - TheHill.com

The White House is bracing for an ugly unemployment report on Friday made worse by winter storms. hit the East Coast last month.

Hoyer knew of Massa allegations - John Bresnahan and Josh <b>…</b>

Hoyer said <b>news</b> of the sexual harassment allegation — coming on the same day Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) gave up his gavel on the Ways and Means Committee — shouldn't give Republicans a leg up in November. …

March 1, 2010

personal finance planning

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 8:01 pm

My previous post on Sarah Palin needs some clarification. First, persons who are attracted to Tea Party events, and who watch Fox News, are the real focus of my arguments, not Sarah Palin. Second, I want to apologize that I will be using the Nazi analogy. This analogy is used too often and innappropriately. However, the history of the NSDAP is what I did my graduate work in, and I still work in this area academically. In other words, it's my area of expertise, so I know, I rely on it too often to make political arguments. Guilty.

One huge mistake the German Left made in the 1920s was to underestimate the power of fanatism and desperation. The Left, and democrats made up a solid plurality of all Germans, maybe even a viable majority. The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) regularly received over 40% of votes in national elections. Berlin was popularly called “Red Berlin” because of the large numbers of socialists and union members in the city. But by 1930 when the depression hit, the SPD was ossified, timid, uninspiring, and delusional. There are many reasons for this. The key one for the purpose of this blog's entry however is because they underestimated the power of fanatism and desperation.

The Left discounted the Nazis as a fringe group of lunatics and bigots (as many here at TPM see Palin et al). They were a fringe group of lunatics and bigots. But that's NOT the point. The point was the Left should have identified WHY there was a fringe group of lunatics and bigots. But the Left did not do this. Instead, they, as one person (Aunt Sam) here has said about Palin et al, just labeled them as hopeless bigots who should have said “no” to Hitler. How convenient, they should have said no, but they didn't, so just off with them.

We all know how this story ended, but it could have been prevented very, very easily. By simply waking-up from their comfortable stuper, the SPD should have confronted the Nazis by being dynamic, active, innovative, and revolutionary. The difficult economic and social conditions in Germany caused good people to become disillusioned with democracy. It did not seem to be working. It was failing them. The only group offering them easy answers to difficult questions were the Nazis with their lies, spectacle, and promise to sweep the dead wood out. This is how all humans react. Go ahead and expect them to do right and say “no,” but history shows over and over that humans do not react this way. This is happening now in the U.S. Germans did not want to buy what Nazis offered (the largest support Nazis ever got in a free election was 36.8%), but they ended up giving them a try because there just was no alternative.

Obama got elected because he promised change, and alternative. Now, let's have it before it is too late. Crack down on corporations, the military-industrial complex, and the health-care industry. Only then, will the lunatics stop being lunatics. Only then they will say “no.” Only then they will be rational and do the right thing.

There are several ways to look at the next presidential election in 2012, especially since the current and new president, Barack Obama, appears unuusually vulnerable to being limited to one term.

This early vulnerability, after only about one year in office, could, following the 2010 mid-term elections this year, provoke an intraparty challenge to the president, as happened in 1980 when then-Senator Ted Kennedy took on incumbent President Jimmy Carter. Kennedy ultimately failed in that effort, but a politically wounded Carter went on to defeat by Ronald Reagan in the November election that followed.

Although it would take a huge wave reversal this year in the congressional elections, the Republicans might take control of one or both houses of Congress as early as this year.

All of this remains speculative, at this point, since so many events and conditions can intervene in an eight-month and thirty-two month interval. Political fortunes rarely go very long in a straight line either up or down.

But if all this predictive caution isn’t enough, I suggest that an even much longer period of time may be in order for political and policy planning for candidates and their political parties if they are not only to win the next political cycles, but govern successfully as well.

Barack Obama has been a political phenomenon. In 2008, the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination was Hillary Clinton, then a U.S. senator from New York.

But it was the novice US.senator from Illinois, Mr. Obama, who survived a long, closely fought battle up to the Democratic convention, and then went on to defeat Republican nominee John McCain in November. Although the latter was in the end a decisive victory for the first black U.S. president, it should not be forgotten that following their own convention and just before the mortgage banking crisis, the McCain-Palin ticket had pulled ahead in the race. The financial meltdown effectively ended the presidential race, but without it, it is not dispositively clear who wins.

In any event, Barack Obama did win, and did have a reasonably good idea for some time before election day that he would become the next president. While there is some evidence that Mr. Obama and his advisers, and certainly Democratic congressional leaders, had some idea of “what” they wanted to do if they won, there is now little evidence that any of them, especially in the executive branch, had thought out “how” they would accomplish their goals.

The “what” of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid political team has turned out to be a radical series of public policies which are mostly quite unpopular with U.S. voters. Even with huge majorities in both houses of Congress, they have been unable to pass very much legislation. In an historically brief time, in fact, they have squandered their decisive 2006 and 2008 victories, and appear he…

Comment / Read More >

2020Green by Second Story

http://removeripoffreports.net

personal finance planning

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 4:03 am

Perhaps the most standout feature of this revamp is the improved categorization that takes a ton of work off the plate of the user. The guys at Quicken have developed a learning algorithm for Quicken Online that allows users to self-tag, with the Quicken Online software remembering those tags and then applying them to other people's data. The more people who use it, the smarter the tagging gets. In my tests, the automatic categorizing/tagging works exceedingly well. Though Quicken Essentials takes a lot of cues from Mint.com, it's method of categorization is different (and superior). Mint obtains its categorization by performing a relatively simple Yellow Pages look-up. Later in the year Intuit will be combining the two approaches and hopes to achieve 95% categorization accuracy (Intuit bought Mint in 2009).

Out of the box, Quicken Essentials supports 12,000 US and Canadian banks. That will grow to 16,000 banks in the next 2-3 months. That's full coverage of every credit union and bank in the US. Transferring and converting your data from Quicken for Windows to Quicken Essentials worked pretty well in my tests. I just saved a copy of my Quicken for Windows file, moved it to my Mac, and double-clicked on it. All my data was easily imported without any errors. Keep in mind that I was only working with two years of Quicken data though. Quicken Essentials allows for conversion from previous Mac programs, Quicken for Windows 2007+, and the now defunct Microsoft Money.

If you're like me and just want a simple program to view all your financial accounts, see where your money is going, and keep track of balances and upcoming bills, I highly recommend Quicken Essentials. If, however, you're a Quicken power user who needs investing and planning tools, investment buy and sell tracking, TurboTax integration, or in-app bill pay, then QEM is not for you. Think of this edition of Quicken Essentials as iPhoto for your finances. It presents a snapshot of your finances and transactions in a simple to use interface. If you need more than that, it's best to look at iBank or Quicken Premier for Windows running under VMWare Fusion or Parallels.

Quicken Essentials for the Mac goes on sale today for $69 and requires Mac OS X 10.5 or 10.6, an Intel-based Mac, and 1GB of hard disk space.

There are several ways to look at the next presidential election in 2012, especially since the current and new president, Barack Obama, appears unuusually vulnerable to being limited to one term.

This early vulnerability, after only about one year in office, could, following the 2010 mid-term elections this year, provoke an intraparty challenge to the president, as happened in 1980 when then-Senator Ted Kennedy took on incumbent President Jimmy Carter. Kennedy ultimately failed in that effort, but a politically wounded Carter went on to defeat by Ronald Reagan in the November election that followed.

Although it would take a huge wave reversal this year in the congressional elections, the Republicans might take control of one or both houses of Congress as early as this year.

All of this remains speculative, at this point, since so many events and conditions can intervene in an eight-month and thirty-two month interval. Political fortunes rarely go very long in a straight line either up or down.

But if all this predictive caution isn’t enough, I suggest that an even much longer period of time may be in order for political and policy planning for candidates and their political parties if they are not only to win the next political cycles, but govern successfully as well.

Barack Obama has been a political phenomenon. In 2008, the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination was Hillary Clinton, then a U.S. senator from New York.

But it was the novice US.senator from Illinois, Mr. Obama, who survived a long, closely fought battle up to the Democratic convention, and then went on to defeat Republican nominee John McCain in November. Although the latter was in the end a decisive victory for the first black U.S. president, it should not be forgotten that following their own convention and just before the mortgage banking crisis, the McCain-Palin ticket had pulled ahead in the race. The financial meltdown effectively ended the presidential race, but without it, it is not dispositively clear who wins.

In any event, Barack Obama did win, and did have a reasonably good idea for some time before election day that he would become the next president. While there is some evidence that Mr. Obama and his advisers, and certainly Democratic congressional leaders, had some idea of “what” they wanted to do if they won, there is now little evidence that any of them, especially in the executive branch, had thought out “how” they would accomplish their goals.

The “what” of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid political team has turned out to be a radical series of public policies which are mostly quite unpopular with U.S. voters. Even with huge majorities in both houses of Congress, they have been unable to pass very much legislation. In an historically brief time, in fact, they have squandered their decisive 2006 and 2008 victories, and appear he…

Comment / Read More >

2020Green by Second Story

http://removeripoffreports.net

February 28, 2010

personal finance books

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 1:03 pm

When Bridget Jones' Diary became a hit in the mid-1990s, it spawned the lucrative chick lit cottage industry. True, romance novels always existed, and Jackie Collins had a corner on the trashy beach-read. But chick lit, with its urban career gals as protagonists, was a modern alternative to the bodice-ripping dime store selections and heavy literary fiction that often got lost in its own depth.

Soon, though, chick lit became a parody of itself, with its pastel colored covers that almost always included a martini and/or a woman wearing stilettos. Plots often involved a disgruntled assistant working in New York media (usually a thinly veiled magazine) and there was usually a gay sidekick and a wacky friend. A crushing break up occurred in the early chapters and our fearless female had to spend the remaining pages rebuilding her life with the aforementioned motley crew in tow.

Writers and publishers aimed to do better, since sales depend on offering readers something new. As a second wave of chick lit is published, the old cliches have been replaced with a few new ones. But at least the pastel covers are gone.

Being a Hedge Fund Wife: Everyone loves a glimpse into the lives of the rich and fabulous, but the trend of being a hedge fund wife was unexpected. It used to be that up and coming gold diggers wanted to be doctors' wives. The hedge fund wife is the new ticket to a life of leisure. (Is this economy?) While there is nothing wrong with writing about niches in society, these new books make it seem like the Hedgies are American's new crop of royalty, which is hardly the case.

The problem is that the heroines in books such as The Ex Mrs. Hedgefund and Hedge Fund Wives are not particularly empowered. Neither leading lady in either selection is employed and both are left by their financial wizard husbands for younger models. (Big shock there!) More disturbing, though, is that both feel entitled to a large cut of his earnings. Maybe if they had jobs they wouldn't have to rely on the ex-husbands for financial security. But that wouldn't be very leisurely, would it?

Regardless of what sector you're writing about, it's important to get the lingo right, a problem that plagues Hedge Fund Wives. Even the most casual observer of the news knows that the current financial crisis was caused by mortgage-back securities, not mortgage-backed equities.. That said, before writing about hedge funds, it's crucial understand Finance 101. There's a difference between a security and an equity.

More baffling: the word 'chartreuse' is used in almost every chapter of HFW to describe everything from ties, furniture to shoes.

Defecting To Paris: Sometimes life in the states becomes too much to bear, and you have no choice but to flee. Luckily, if you're a character in a chick lit novel, France is waiting with open arms. Lizzie Nichols in Queen of Babble heads to a winery outside Paris after her British boyfriend turns out to be a deadbeat. Jennifer Hunter in Love Under Cover high tails it to Paris to work as a bartender after her Fidelity Inspection business takes a toll on her personal life. France offers new chances at love, (who woulda thunk it?) but at the price of being a steaming pile of cliche.

Being A Fat Chick: When Wally Lanb wrote She's Come Undone in 1992, it was extraordinary because writing about the foibles of being a heavy woman was relatively innovative. Sure, Judy Blume wrote Blubber in 1974, but for the most part portly main characters weren't common in mainstream fiction.

Perhaps as a sort of backlash to the thin, media types in the first wave of chick lit, it's now hip to be round. Meg Cabot's character in The Queen of Babble books is a recovering fat girl, who fears, more than anything, carbs. Cabot then created a mystery series starring Heather Wells, a former teen idol who has ballooned to a size 12. (Egads!) Jen Lancaster built an entire brand on being not just heavy, but also a caustic smart ass with some junk in the trunk. It's a clever gimmick to sell books aimed at “real” women, but as a reader, I'm full on the fat girl trend. Next course, please!

Working At Lazard: Momzillas and The Mating Rituals of the North American WASP both have characters that worked at Lazard before becoming either a stay at home mom or running their own small business. While it's a solid company, it's a random choice as far as setting up a character to be competent and financially independent. Why not go Goldman Sachs?

Plots move quicker, though, when money isn't an issue, so it makes sense to give a character a background in banking. What's interesting is that these characters are always alumnae of investor relations, portraying it as some pink-collar job in finance, which it isn't. They are never former traders or analysts, never in private equity or M&A. I understand the need to create evolved female characters, but writers aren't helping the sisterhood by keeping them in the same job, over and over.

Writers of chick lit aren't out to save the world - they're out to entertain. These are books women read on subways and while we're getting pedicures. It's escapism. Given chick lit's audience, authors have a unique opportunity to explore the state of modern womanhood, albeit wrapped in the backdrop of a light love story. Readers are a finicky bunch who demand new themes, a challenge any writer should embrace. Otherwise, we'll defect right back to Jackie Collins.

My previous post on Sarah Palin needs some clarification. First, persons who are attracted to Tea Party events, and who watch Fox News, are the real focus of my arguments, not Sarah Palin. Second, I want to apologize that I will be using the Nazi analogy. This analogy is used too often and innappropriately. However, the history of the NSDAP is what I did my graduate work in, and I still work in this area academically. In other words, it's my area of expertise, so I know, I rely on it too often to make political arguments. Guilty.

One huge mistake the German Left made in the 1920s was to underestimate the power of fanatism and desperation. The Left, and democrats made up a solid plurality of all Germans, maybe even a viable majority. The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) regularly received over 40% of votes in national elections. Berlin was popularly called “Red Berlin” because of the large numbers of socialists and union members in the city. But by 1930 when the depression hit, the SPD was ossified, timid, uninspiring, and delusional. There are many reasons for this. The key one for the purpose of this blog's entry however is because they underestimated the power of fanatism and desperation.

The Left discounted the Nazis as a fringe group of lunatics and bigots (as many here at TPM see Palin et al). They were a fringe group of lunatics and bigots. But that's NOT the point. The point was the Left should have identified WHY there was a fringe group of lunatics and bigots. But the Left did not do this. Instead, they, as one person (Aunt Sam) here has said about Palin et al, just labeled them as hopeless bigots who should have said “no” to Hitler. How convenient, they should have said no, but they didn't, so just off with them.

We all know how this story ended, but it could have been prevented very, very easily. By simply waking-up from their comfortable stuper, the SPD should have confronted the Nazis by being dynamic, active, innovative, and revolutionary. The difficult economic and social conditions in Germany caused good people to become disillusioned with democracy. It did not seem to be working. It was failing them. The only group offering them easy answers to difficult questions were the Nazis with their lies, spectacle, and promise to sweep the dead wood out. This is how all humans react. Go ahead and expect them to do right and say “no,” but history shows over and over that humans do not react this way. This is happening now in the U.S. Germans did not want to buy what Nazis offered (the largest support Nazis ever got in a free election was 36.8%), but they ended up giving them a try because there just was no alternative.

Obama got elected because he promised change, and alternative. Now, let's have it before it is too late. Crack down on corporations, the military-industrial complex, and the health-care industry. Only then, will the lunatics stop being lunatics. Only then they will say “no.” Only then they will be rational and do the right thing.

27/365 - So Money by Miss Cheska

http://removeripoffreports.net

February 26, 2010

Franchise Magazine

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 10:02 pm

7 Responses to “BizWeek Bulks Up”

  1. Joseph T Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    Business Week got rid of Michael Mandel who used to offer a unique perspective on economics. Now with some exceptions, the magazine reads like a bunch of rehashed Associated Press stories.

  2. Mark E Hoffer Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    “…step in where the WSJ used to be. That offers a big opportunity for Bloomberg and BusinessWeek if they can figure out the formula (and staff.)”

    big ‘if’, big Reward, if they can pull it off.

    they should remember that BW’s archives are valuable, and put them to good use.

    for BBerg, the BW acq. is a good risk..

  3. Jojo Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    As a long time BW subscriber, I find the quality of the magazine and the stories to be improving since Bloomberg took over.

    The mag seems more focused now with less nonsense. They’ve gotten rid of some fluff (including that sorry ass “economist” James Cooper and the Jack Welch & wifey corporate rah-rah column at the end). Also, have noticed no more photo’s of columnists.

    Yes, the website could use a redesign. The reader comment UI really needs to be revamped. McGraw Hill wasn’t exactly a paragon of good design skills.

  4. kaleberg Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    I’m a big fan of Fortune magazine from the 1930s, their first decade. They came out monthly, and had lots of multi-page articles describing the nuts and bolts of various businesses. Back then they made cans, compressed gases, radios, cameras, leather, corn and pork, and the articles explained the product, the structure of the business, their costs, their profits, their internal conflicts and their history.

    The article on the pork business was excellent. I haven’t even seen an article on the pork business in years, but I know I can still buy pork, so surely someone is producing it. Did you know that they used the squeal for radio static? So much for that old canard about using everything but the squeal. In fact, the only thing they didn’t use was the paunch manure. They sold that to chemical processing specialists.

    There it was in one twelve page article: process, business, balance sheets, history, prospects. That was journalism, and it didn’t need to be yesterday’s news. Too much business coverage is about events, not business. In fact, most investors don’t have the slightest clue as to how the company’s they own make money. That’s what Fortune once covered, and the facts didn’t change from day to day. Fortune published monthly and offered great insights into the business world. I’d love to see a more modern version of such in-depth coverage.

  5. DM RTA Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    Barry,
    I agree with your take on the WSJ. It was valued too high, and in order to run the store after the deal the business had to be changed (and yes, it has suffered compared to past days). A good analogy might be a cash rich property investor making a play for a property in a declining neighborhood (if that makes any sense). If you think about why this analogy fits, what it really says is that the changing needs of the market is what is being recognized. So the issue is really a product need…and less a promotion need. As channels of digital communications proliferate more focus should be placed upon both product design of content and how users interact with it. This may well sound obvious but it isn’t being done by cost conscious mangers worried about their jobs.

    The market for the WSJ’s old style articles you mentioned above is being absorbed by the blogs and website universe. The fish or cut bait challenge is how will they find you or should we find them? That’s the part of the media world evolving most quickly right now. Google readers or Netvibes? Surfing has become more occasional for many. Social media links? What design will funnel the demand effectively?
    I see obvious answers but most of the world is still broadcasting and not interacting yet….even though the technology suggests otherwise. In short the days of making it and retailing it are over. The consumer deserves better and its on its way. Your blog has been part of that process.

  6. DM RTA Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    one more thing….

    the new iPay model will probably be a miss because the funnel is too wide.

  7. bsneath Says:

    January 30th, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    There is definitely a need for a higher quality business magazine. BW had become the McDonalds of business news with little in-depth or insightful reporting and analysis.

    Bloomberg has an excellent track record in business & financial info services and I’ll bet he turns BW around.

    I never could comprehend Mandel’s “intangible capital” thesis. I think it was an attempt to explain the results of what we now understand was a monumental liquidity bubble.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sean Gregory of TIME Magazine has Lindsey Vonn recently riffing on the Tiger Woods speech last week:

Like millions of Americans, Vonn can’t help poking fun at Woods’ staged event. When a member of her Vonn-tourage tells her that Woods gave a few friends hugs after ending his statement, she cracks, “They’re like, ‘Yeah, you’re awesome, you go have that sex.’ ” The room breaks into a laugh. Then she describes a skit she would want to perform if asked to host Saturday Night Live: picture Vonn at Woods’ podium, blue backdrop and all. “There’s something you don’t know about me,” Vonn says in a faux solemn, apologetic voice. “Tiger, you’re like my idol, and I too have a sex problem.” More laughter. “That would be freaking funny.”

Vonn is serious about the SNL thing. Very serious.

Will Saturday Night Live be one of them? “I’m hoping for it,” she says. “I’ve got to call [NBC Sports chairman] Dick Ebersol to see if SNL will have me. I have some ideas.” An appearance by Vonn may not get Woods’ ratings, but it would be worth tuning in.

Ebersol actually created the SNL franchise, with Lorne Michaels. Thanks to Vonn’s gold medal, SPORTS ILLUSTRATED cover appearance and subsequent spread in SI’s swimsuit issue, it’s a given she’ll be hosting SNL as soon as the Olympics conclude.

One of the most successful and fondly remembered film franchises of the early 70s was the PLANET OF THE APES series. Unfortunately, rather than invest more effort and money into each new installment (like the James Bond films) the APES producers seemed to invest less in each subsequent film turning them into cheaper and cheaper “kiddie flicks”. Is it any wonder that the franchise came to a crashing halt with the fifth in the series?

PLANET OF THE APES burst into cinemas in 1968 and was a smash hit. Based on the French novel MONKEY PLANET by Pierre Boulle, the screenplay was developed by Rod Serling of TWILIGHT ZONE fame (which may account for the film’s devastating twist ending). Charlton Heston starred as Taylor, one of four astronauts who spend thousands of years in cryogenic sleep and crashland onto an alien world where apes have evolved into the dominant species and humans are merely dumb animals. Showing himself to be a superior type of human, Taylor is captured and put on trial as a danger to the continued supremacy of ape culture. A pair of sympathetic scientists help Taylor to escape and come face to face with his destiny.

The movie was so successful that a sequel was inevitable. Heston reprised his role as Taylor but only in a supporting role and with the provision that he be killed off at the film’s conclusion. BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES went a step further than the previous film and posed the idea that there was a subterranean subculture of mutant humans that survived the cataclysm that caused the near extinction of mankind. Apes and humans collide in a terrible underground war that causes the detonation of a nuclear warhead, resulting in the destruction of the entire planet. Not only was Heston’s character killed off but so was everyone in the entire movie. A sequel to BENEATH seemed quite impossible.

However, one must never underestimate the power of a box office hit. BENEATH made enough money that another sequel was developed. ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES dealt with a trio of ape scientists who managed to find and fly Taylor’s downed spacecraft. They get caught in a time warp caused by the destruction of the planet and are hurled back through time to present day America. They are embraced by humanity at first, becoming popular media sensations but soon they becomes victims of the same paranoia that made Taylor an object of fear and hatred in their own time. The ending is not a happy one, though a talking ape child is able to survive, insuring that the series will go on.

This child grows up to become Caesar, the protagonist of CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES. In the wake of a plague that kills off all domesticated cats and dogs on Earth, apes have become not only household pets but also a new source of cheap labor, ostensibly a class of slaves. Caesar, disgusted at how his brethren are treated, instigates a worldwide rebellion that culminates in the subjugation of humankind. The hardcore militancy of Caesar and his manifesto were toned down quite a bit from the original script but the overthrow of the status quo still makes for a powerful conclusion. Roddy McDowall, who played Cornelius in PLANET and ESCAPE (a scheduling conflict prevented him from taking on the role in BENEATH), now plays his own son and becomes indelibly associated with the APES series.

BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES followed soon after CONQUEST and picked up the story some years after the rebellion. The big cities have been destroyed in a terrible war and the apes have come out on top. Caesar is attempting to get humans and apes to live in peaceful co-existence but the apes are still resentful of their treatment at the hands of humans in the past. A battalion of mutants living in the ruins of a radioactive city nearby learn of Caesar’s advances in creating a new culture and emerge from their hiding place to wage war once again. This installment of the series was fairly simplistic and the budget was quite minuscule compared to the earlier films in the series. It seemed to be made with only the kiddie market in mind. Subsequently adult movie patrons passed on the film and its box office receipts were extremely disappointing.

There was nowhere for the franchise to go now but TV. The first films aired on CBS and got huge ratings. Therefore it was decided that a PLANET OF THE APES TV series would be developed. A brand new storyline was created centering on two more astronauts who crashland on the ape world. Humans have not yet lost the ability to speak but they are definitely a lower class, subservient to the apes. One ape, Galen (once again played by Roddy McDowall), befriends the humans and the three of them become fugitives, traveling from place to place to escape capture. The all-too-familiar FUGITIVE template didn’t prove to be particularly compelling to TV viewers and the show was cancelled after a mere thirteen episodes.

Still adamant that there was some sort of revenue to be squeezed out of the franchise, a Saturday morning cartoon show was created. It was titled RETURN TO THE PLANET OF THE APES and once again, a group of wayward astronauts finds themselves trapped in a world where apes rule. The animation was extremely limited but the writing was actually quite a bit better than the standard cartoon fare of the time. It was even arguably more complex and imaginative than the live action series . Still, it was a Saturday morning kids show and adult fans paid no attention to it whatsoever.

Marvel Comics put out a black and white PLANET OF THE APES magazine around the same time that the live action TV series began. They adapted the first five movies into comics form and also began a series of original storylines fleshing out events that took place in between the movies. The magazine was cancelled before they could begin adapting the TV episodes but at least they completed adaptations of all five films. Adventure Comics tried to revive the title in the 90s but the writing and drawing talent was nowhere near the caliber of Marvel’s original comics and the books never made much of an impact.

Such Hollywood notables as Arnold Schwartzenegger and Oliver Stone were approached about revamping the series for modern movie audiences but the deals never came into fruition. Eventually Tim Burton was chosen to develop his own take on the franchise in 1999. Though the make-up and special effects were impressive, this new PLANET OF THE APES suffered from a lackluster script, bland performances and a “twist ending” that was in no way comparable to the original’s. Tim Burton’s ending was a closely-guarded secret right up until the release date… perhaps building up expectations too high. The movie was a disappointment to fans and not enough of a financial success to generate more sequels. Dark Horse Comics released a comic book adaptation of the movie and a half-hearted mini-series or two but they proved to have even less of an impact than the new film.

The PLANET OF THE APES franchise now seems quite dead… as dead as the lifeless ball of ice that circles the sun at the end of BENEATH.

7 Responses to “BizWeek Bulks Up”

  1. Joseph T Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    Business Week got rid of Michael Mandel who used to offer a unique perspective on economics. Now with some exceptions, the magazine reads like a bunch of rehashed Associated Press stories.

  2. Mark E Hoffer Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    “…step in where the WSJ used to be. That offers a big opportunity for Bloomberg and BusinessWeek if they can figure out the formula (and staff.)”

    big ‘if’, big Reward, if they can pull it off.

    they should remember that BW’s archives are valuable, and put them to good use.

    for BBerg, the BW acq. is a good risk..

  3. Jojo Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    As a long time BW subscriber, I find the quality of the magazine and the stories to be improving since Bloomberg took over.

    The mag seems more focused now with less nonsense. They’ve gotten rid of some fluff (including that sorry ass “economist” James Cooper and the Jack Welch & wifey corporate rah-rah column at the end). Also, have noticed no more photo’s of columnists.

    Yes, the website could use a redesign. The reader comment UI really needs to be revamped. McGraw Hill wasn’t exactly a paragon of good design skills.

  4. kaleberg Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    I’m a big fan of Fortune magazine from the 1930s, their first decade. They came out monthly, and had lots of multi-page articles describing the nuts and bolts of various businesses. Back then they made cans, compressed gases, radios, cameras, leather, corn and pork, and the articles explained the product, the structure of the business, their costs, their profits, their internal conflicts and their history.

    The article on the pork business was excellent. I haven’t even seen an article on the pork business in years, but I know I can still buy pork, so surely someone is producing it. Did you know that they used the squeal for radio static? So much for that old canard about using everything but the squeal. In fact, the only thing they didn’t use was the paunch manure. They sold that to chemical processing specialists.

    There it was in one twelve page article: process, business, balance sheets, history, prospects. That was journalism, and it didn’t need to be yesterday’s news. Too much business coverage is about events, not business. In fact, most investors don’t have the slightest clue as to how the company’s they own make money. That’s what Fortune once covered, and the facts didn’t change from day to day. Fortune published monthly and offered great insights into the business world. I’d love to see a more modern version of such in-depth coverage.

  5. DM RTA Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    Barry,
    I agree with your take on the WSJ. It was valued too high, and in order to run the store after the deal the business had to be changed (and yes, it has suffered compared to past days). A good analogy might be a cash rich property investor making a play for a property in a declining neighborhood (if that makes any sense). If you think about why this analogy fits, what it really says is that the changing needs of the market is what is being recognized. So the issue is really a product need…and less a promotion need. As channels of digital communications proliferate more focus should be placed upon both product design of content and how users interact with it. This may well sound obvious but it isn’t being done by cost conscious mangers worried about their jobs.

    The market for the WSJ’s old style articles you mentioned above is being absorbed by the blogs and website universe. The fish or cut bait challenge is how will they find you or should we find them? That’s the part of the media world evolving most quickly right now. Google readers or Netvibes? Surfing has become more occasional for many. Social media links? What design will funnel the demand effectively?
    I see obvious answers but most of the world is still broadcasting and not interacting yet….even though the technology suggests otherwise. In short the days of making it and retailing it are over. The consumer deserves better and its on its way. Your blog has been part of that process.

  6. DM RTA Says:

    January 29th, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    one more thing….

    the new iPay model will probably be a miss because the funnel is too wide.

  7. bsneath Says:

    January 30th, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    There is definitely a need for a higher quality business magazine. BW had become the McDonalds of business news with little in-depth or insightful reporting and analysis.

    Bloomberg has an excellent track record in business & financial info services and I’ll bet he turns BW around.

    I never could comprehend Mandel’s “intangible capital” thesis. I think it was an attempt to explain the results of what we now understand was a monumental liquidity bubble.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sean Gregory of TIME Magazine has Lindsey Vonn recently riffing on the Tiger Woods speech last week:

Like millions of Americans, Vonn can’t help poking fun at Woods’ staged event. When a member of her Vonn-tourage tells her that Woods gave a few friends hugs after ending his statement, she cracks, “They’re like, ‘Yeah, you’re awesome, you go have that sex.’ ” The room breaks into a laugh. Then she describes a skit she would want to perform if asked to host Saturday Night Live: picture Vonn at Woods’ podium, blue backdrop and all. “There’s something you don’t know about me,” Vonn says in a faux solemn, apologetic voice. “Tiger, you’re like my idol, and I too have a sex problem.” More laughter. “That would be freaking funny.”

Vonn is serious about the SNL thing. Very serious.

Will Saturday Night Live be one of them? “I’m hoping for it,” she says. “I’ve got to call [NBC Sports chairman] Dick Ebersol to see if SNL will have me. I have some ideas.” An appearance by Vonn may not get Woods’ ratings, but it would be worth tuning in.

Ebersol actually created the SNL franchise, with Lorne Michaels. Thanks to Vonn’s gold medal, SPORTS ILLUSTRATED cover appearance and subsequent spread in SI’s swimsuit issue, it’s a given she’ll be hosting SNL as soon as the Olympics conclude.

Pepper Lunch in Asian Franchise magazine by chuvaness

bill bartmann on making forensic mortgage audit established franchises for sale, existing franchises for sale, low cost franchises sale franchises for sale online stock trading

February 15, 2010

Making Easy Money

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 9:49 pm

Dallas Lawrence is Chair of the Social and Digital Media Practice at Levick Strategic Communications, the nation’s top crisis communications firm. He blogs on emerging digital media trends and best practices for social media engagement on Bulletproof Blog. Connect with him on Twitter @dallaslawrence.

Social networks have truly come of age in the last year. No longer viewed as lonely outposts for youthful college slackers, the reach of these platforms has grown exponentially. Today, more than two-thirds of the world’s Internet users visit the social networking sites that reel in billions of eyeballs every 24 hours.

Yet, despite the staggering growth of social networking, determining how to monetize social media platforms remains a tough code to crack for even the savviest of companies. As such, identifying new revenue models will be instrumental in kicking off the next cycle of the social networking phenomenon in 2010.

If Anyone Can Do It, Facebook Can

Facebook, social networking’s acknowledged leader, has surpassed every platform on the market today, corralling more than 350 million unique users globally. If any social network is poised to design a winning formula for successful revenue streams in 2010, it’s Facebook. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has set an aggressive agenda for the company, publically stating that he “expects social networks to become as essential as web browsers and operating systems,” and he has set the lofty — yet entirely realistic — goal of 1 billion users worldwide.

In the less than five years since it expanded beyond scholastic audiences, Facebook has not only grabbed the lion’s share of users, it has engaged them like no other platform on the Internet. The average Facebook user visits the site at least once a day and spends an astounding 55 minutes engaging friends and family –- statistics that another Zucker (Jeff) would probably kill for over at NBC.

While translating such popularity into dollars and cents isn’t easy –- especially in an industry whose users have grown accustomed to getting something for nothing –- Facebook could potentially provide a monetization template that would revolutionize social networking as we know it.

The Next Level of Advertising Revenue

Advertising has traditionally provided the simplest means of generating revenue. PricewaterhouseCoopers reported in October that Internet advertising revenues totaled $10.9 billion for the first half of 2009. It’s been estimated that Facebook alone took in $435 million of that total. But for a site with nearly half a billion users, a quarter of which spend more time within the network than watching television, these numbers represent just the beginning potential.

First, Facebook needs to admit to itself that it is in the business of selling ads. By better managing its advertising network, intelligently expanding its marketing options, and developing workable social ads that leverage the branding power of friends and connections, Facebook can begin to capture its rightful share of online ad revenues. The final piece is to increase awareness and understanding of Facebook ads among corporate decision makers.

For example, every executive in America today understands the value of purchasing Google ads –- and that didn’t happen by accident. Google understood that what caused it to dominate online search wasn’t going to ultimately position the company as a global corporate powerhouse valued at nearly $200 billion. Google’s aggressive marketing, communications, and lobbying shops have worked to ensure every ad buyer, political campaign, marketing executive, and public relations flack knows the value of the service and has direct and easy access to account executives who explain the much worshiped “ROI” Google ads provide.

Today, Facebook stands on the precipice Google inhabited just before it became a top money-maker. By taking a page from the Google playbook, and aggressively marketing — and explaining — its power to influence buying decisions, Facebook ads could become as essential to 21st Century marketing as the yellow pages were in the 20th Century.

E-Commerce – Stop Sending Customers Away

The launch of Facebook as a true e-commerce site holds immense potential as a business solution and could forever change the way we shop. Online purchases through the first three quarters of 2009 totaled $98.3 billion according to the Department of Commerce. For the majority of companies selling products online who are also engaged on Facebook, opening Facebook fully to direct e-commerce transactions will dramatically change how businesses advertise and how consumers buy goods online.

Consumers and companies would flock to a Facebook storefront for one simple reason: We do everything else there. Imagine an integrated, one-click solution whereby your friends see your recent purchases (because you were incentivized by the brand to share your information) in their feed and are able to simply point, click, and purchase the same item.

With a few adjustments, companies can make timely offers of birthday gifts for friends, travel arrangements for event items, or the latest music from favorite artists –- and make the sale without forcing the user to leave Facebook or put in new login information.

Rather than driving their 350 million users away from the platform to “close the deal” with retailers and purchase the item on an external platform, Facebook could benefit financially by charging companies a percentage of sales, a fixed rate to have a storefront, or from increased advertising opportunities.

Premium Subscription Options

Finally, whether users like it or not, Facebook will do itself a long term disservice if it does not consider premium subscription options. Users (whether they are corporations or teenagers) are amenable to paying for even the simplest features and functionality, as evidenced by the success of Facebook gifts.

Nothing good in life is free. It’s a stark, mature reality that Facebook (and its users) need to face in 2010. By leveraging economies of scale, Facebook can churn a sizable profit without alienating users. Would you pay one dollar a month to share higher-resolution photos or upload higher-quality or longer videos? Last month, 2.5 billion photos were uploaded to Facebook. Even if only a quarter of the site’s active users opted for premium options, this one change would generate more than $1 billion in annual revenues.

Improving advertising, developing an e-commerce platform, and adding subscription services will not only generate the revenue necessary to make the transition from highly adopted to highly profitable, it will open revenue streams — as Google did before — for the next generation of digital developments.

More business resources from Mashable:

- Social Media Marketing: How Pepsi Got It Right
- 5 Ways Small Businesses Can Avoid Social Media Panic
- HOW TO: Take Advantage of Social Media in Your E-mail Marketing
- HOW TO: Implement a Social Media Business Strategy
- 18 Online Productivity Tools for Your Business

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, peterspiro

Crist making it … too easy

posted at 3:10 pm on January 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

One might think that the new polls showing Marco Rubio closing the gap on Charlie Crist might have the Governor looking for ways to negate the notion that he’s an ally of Barack Obama and big-government spending.  Obama himself is now under water in Florida, according to the latest Quinnipiac polling, so linking himself to Obama would seem like playing into Rubio’s hands.  And yet, tying himself to Obama is apparently exactly what Crist wants to do:

Gov. Charlie Crist, who has been taking a steady pounding for his “man hug” with President Obama in Fort Myers last February, says he may be with the president again at the University of Tampa Thursday when the president may announce a major award of high-speed rail money for Florida — money that state officials say will create thousands of new jobs. …

“Currently, I have plans to be in Tampa on Thursday for the Board of Governors (meeting). We’re going to  announce the new membership. If we can work it out logistically, I will be with him,” Crist said.

When reporter Steve Thomas pointed out to Crist that the “man hug” problem still hangs over his campaign, Crist insisted that he didn’t care — and that his concern was “fighting for jobs” in Florida.  Of course, that was the same excuse Crist used when campaigning for Porkulus last Feburary.  He tried to cast people opposed to the useless $787 billion massive pork expenditure as needlessly partisan and himself as a voice of pragmatic reason.  Those opponents look a lot more pragmatic now than Crist does, and Crist looks a lot more opportunistic than principled.

Now we have Obama bringing pork to Florida again, only with his own approval numbers sinking.  The high-speed rail jobs may or may not materialize, depending on whether Florida sinks billions of its own money into matching funds normally required for such projects.  Floridians may prefer to spend their money on other types of transportation projects, or not spend the money at all, rather than build more subsidy-floated public transportation.  In either case, Crist is going to make it all the more difficult to separate himself from Obama — and that’s exactly what Rubio wants.

online stock trading, robert shumake, robert shumake, loss mitigation training

February 10, 2010

personal finance

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 8:49 am

When I was first starting to learn about personal finance, the first book I picked up was George Clason's The Richest Man in Babylon. It was really a great book that taught fundamental truths about handling money well, such as living on less than you make, saving money, and making your money earn money. I just ate up what I read, because it was such good stuff.

The next book I picked up was The Total Money Makeover, by Dave Ramsey. It taught a lot of the same principles that The Richest Man in Babylon did, but offered it in a very practical series of “baby steps” for readers to follow to become financially independent. I continued reading, picking up Rich Dad Poor Dad, then the Millionaire Next Door, and then a few others. By the time I was on the Millionaire Next Door, it became quite clear that they were all offering generally the same advice.

There are some different lines of thinking when it comes to personal finance (think Dave Ramsey v. Robert Kiyosaki), however it seems that whenever a new personal finance books comes out, it's just a rehash of something that we've previously read. A great example of this is Loral Langemeier's The Millionaire Maker. In the book she shows her reads how to have an “extreme money makeover,” clearly borrowing from “The Total Money Makeover.” All the advice in the book has been in numerous other personal finance books before, and it offered very little new unique and insightful advice.

The same is true for a slue of other personal finance books that come out. If you've read one of Robert Kiyosaki's books, you've pretty much read them all. All of Dave Ramsey's financial books pretty much contain the same information and don't really offer any unique insight compared to any of his other books. When most finance authors write new books, very rarely do they offer a whole lot of new unique insight. The reason for this is simple, it doesn't take a chapter to explain simple principles such as “You should pay off debt” and “live on less than you make.” The principles are certainly fundamental, but don't necessarily translate well into 200+ page books. Usually they offer all of the good advice they have to offer in their first book, and after that, they are more than likely just looking for money.

If you've read 5 personal finance books by 5 different authors, chances are you've read about all of the advice that's out there for personal finance. These books all have some good advice, but when new finance books come out, there's rarely ever anything new and unique about it that should make experienced personal finance readers to jump out of their chair and head down to Barnes and Nobel to pick it up.

The moral of this story is that if you've already read a few good personal finance books, be sure to read some reviews of the book before going and picking it up. You can't blame an author for trying to make money, but we need to be a bit more selective in our personal finance reading.

AP Stories Reappear on Google <b>News</b>; “Ongoing Discussions <b>…</b>

Google's “sort of temporary detente” with the Associated Press is progressing: now new AP stories have started showing up on Google (NSDQ: GOOG) <b>News</b>—this one, for example, about AP itself—as first noticed by WSJ. …

<b>News</b> to know: Google Buzz, smartphones; Rhapsody; Win7; Adobe <b>…</b>

<b>News</b> to know: Here are today's notable headlines. You can get <b>News</b> To Know via email alert and RSS daily. For continuous updates are BNET'

Transcript of <b>News</b> Conference by President Obama — Politics Daily

<b>NEWS</b> CONFERENCEBY THE PRESIDENTJames S. Brady Press Briefing RoomFebruary 9, 2010; 1:38 PM EST THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. I.

online stock trading tips, online stock trading tips, online stock trading tips, online stock trading tips, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, franchise opportunities, robert shumake, robert shumake, robert shumake, robert shumake, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, surface encounters granite counters, bill bartmann's plan, bill bartmann's plan, bill bartmann's plan, theleaseoptionking sell my house fast

AP Stories Reappear on Google <b>News</b>; “Ongoing Discussions <b>…</b>

Google's “sort of temporary detente” with the Associated Press is progressing: now new AP stories have started showing up on Google (NSDQ: GOOG) <b>News</b>—this one, for example, about AP itself—as first noticed by WSJ. …

<b>News</b> to know: Google Buzz, smartphones; Rhapsody; Win7; Adobe <b>…</b>

<b>News</b> to know: Here are today's notable headlines. You can get <b>News</b> To Know via email alert and RSS daily. For continuous updates are BNET'

Transcript of <b>News</b> Conference by President Obama — Politics Daily

<b>NEWS</b> CONFERENCEBY THE PRESIDENTJames S. Brady Press Briefing RoomFebruary 9, 2010; 1:38 PM EST THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. I.

AP Stories Reappear on Google <b>News</b>; “Ongoing Discussions <b>…</b>

Google's “sort of temporary detente” with the Associated Press is progressing: now new AP stories have started showing up on Google (NSDQ: GOOG) <b>News</b>—this one, for example, about AP itself—as first noticed by WSJ. …

<b>News</b> to know: Google Buzz, smartphones; Rhapsody; Win7; Adobe <b>…</b>

<b>News</b> to know: Here are today's notable headlines. You can get <b>News</b> To Know via email alert and RSS daily. For continuous updates are BNET'

Transcript of <b>News</b> Conference by President Obama — Politics Daily

<b>NEWS</b> CONFERENCEBY THE PRESIDENTJames S. Brady Press Briefing RoomFebruary 9, 2010; 1:38 PM EST THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. I.

February 9, 2010

personal finance programs

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 4:58 am

Tea partiers will be the first to tell you that they don’t intend to
start a third party. They’re angry with Washington and with the
behavior of both parties, but the way toward the nation’s salvation is
to hold current leaders more accountable, not sending new ones to fill
the ranks of Congress. “We just don’t have enough time to do that,”
says Joyce Smith, a retiree from Ellijay, Ga.

Since the movement’s first-ever convention started in Nashville on
Thursday, the pursuit for reporters has simply been to figure out the
force of the movement and how formidable its voice will be in November.
Partiers are uniformly against public spending and expansion of
government, but it’s harder to figure out what exactly they’re for.
Campaigning on “throwing the bums out” might help win an election, but
it’s not a governing strategy. And until now, one of the movement’s
biggest snags has been its inability to articulate concrete changes it
would make to Washington and the federal government.

Until I met a man named Fred Everett, a tea-party patriot from Marietta, Ga. Cognizant of the movement’s lack of a concrete platform, he wrote one. He brought 500 copies to distribute to delegates as a proposed vision for the movement. It’s broken into two parts: fiscal reform and election reform—social programs aren’t included—and the idea is to get candidates to sign it as a pledge before they get tea-party support.

Under fiscal reform, Everett proposes curtailing all earmarks (“regardless of the importance of the legislation”) and balancing the budget by, as he says, sunsetting each and every federal program and “matching federal expenditures with federal revenues.” No exception, although one tiny caveat: no raising taxes. And on that note, he’d like to restructure the tax code to sharply reduce personal and corporate tax rates without shifting the income-tax burden from one income bracket to another. The result, he says, will “grow our national economic pie, create jobs, and increase federal tax revenues.”

Shifting to election reform, Everett thinks it’s unfair that incumbents have the upper hand to finance campaigns with taxpayer money when events coincide with their public duties. He thinks challengers should also get a weekly, federally funded town-hall meeting during the two months before each election. Once elected, lawmakers should be subject to term limits: eight years in the House and 12 years in the Senate. (Some tea partiers tell me the numbers should be higher, others say lower.) And last, to end gerrymandering, all House districts should be redrawn by an independent commission based on “democratic principles.”

Even though Everett’s contract offers some reasoned ideas, it’s a valid question whether candidates would sign on to something still so broad. But if they want tea-party support, they might have to. At yesterday’s press conference, convention organizer Judson Phillips laid down the gauntlet: “The tea party doesn’t endorse candidates; candidates endorse the tea party.”

Cost Overrun Incompetence at Energy

OMB director Peter Orszag is blaming the inefficiencies of the federal government on outdated personal computers. That is hard to understand given that federal IT spending amounted to $200 million a day last year.

A new GAO report on cost overruns at the Department of Energy undercuts Orszag’s argument that the solution to government incompetence is new computers. DOE cost overruns are nothing new. As far back as 1982 the GAO was reporting that “DOE lacked sufficient guidance to provide to its contractors for developing cost estimates.” A 2007 GAO report found that eight of 12 DOE projects it examined had exceeded their initial cost estimate by almost $14 billion due to “ineffective DOE project oversight and poor contractor management.” In 2008, GAO reported that nine out of 10 environmental cleanup projects it examined had cost overruns that DOE estimated would require an additional $25 to $42 billion.

For the new report, the GAO looked at DOE’s contract management procedures and here are some of the highlights:

  • “DOE has not had a policy that establishes standards for cost estimating in place for over a decade, and its guidance is outdated and incomplete, making it difficult for the department to oversee the development of high-quality cost estimates by its contractors.”
  • “DOE’s only cost-estimating direction resides in its project management policy that does not indicate how cost estimates should be developed.” (This statement has to be read several times to actually be believed.)
  • “DOE’s outdated cost-estimating guide assigns responsibilities to offices that no longer exist.”
  • “DOE does not have appropriate internal controls in place that would allow its project managers to provide contractors a standard method for building high-quality cost estimates.”
  • “DOE has drafted a new cost-estimating policy and guide but the department expects to miss its deadline for issuing them by more than a year.”

There’s nothing here that a supercomputer is going to change. Cost overruns in government programs will continue to occur for the simple reason that policymakers and administrators are playing with other people’s money. Moreover, the market forces that compel private firms to manage resources effectively or risk going out of business (unless they are in the auto or finance industries) are absent. DOE won’t be put of business for its cost overruns (although it should be); it’ll just go ask Congress for more taxpayer money.

See this Cato essay for more on cost overruns at the Department of Energy and other government agencies.

buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, internet marketing, yahoo, google, Online advertising, http://www.prlog.org/10512637-franchisesforsalecom-launch-heralds-the-next-wave-in-franchisee-lead-generation.html, http://www.prlog.org/10512639-restaurant-franchise-opportunities-providing-new-job-opportunities.html, http://www.emailwire.com/release/30658-New-Lead-Site-FranchisesforsaleCom-Goes-Live.html, http://www.emailwire.com/release/31568-New-Franchise-Opportunities-for-2010-Online-Tools-and-Resources-for-Buying-a-Franchise.html, http://www.ideamarketers.com/?New_Franchise_Opportunities_for_2010_%E2%80%93_Online_Tools_and_Resources_for_Buying_a_&articleid=883071, http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/new-franchise-opportunities-for-2010,1100822.shtml, http://www.newsalbum.com/Read/473435-New-Franchise-Opportunities-with-Successful-Franchise-Companies-Putting-People-Back-to-Work/, http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=164465&cat=9, http://www.zimbio.com/Housing+Bubble+News/articles/7/Dr+Robert+S+Shumake, http://mortgagefraudreportmichigan.blogspot.com/2009/12/robert-shumake-fraud-report-tax.html, http://personals.szczecin.pl/index.php?topic=2.0, http://tweetmeme.com/story/339636355/surface-encounters-in-wixom-going-green-with-marble-granite-countertop-production, http://finance.bnet.com/bnet/?GUID=11076222&Page=MediaViewer&ChannelID=6526, http://www.ideamarketers.com/?Surface_Encounters_Ohio,_LLC_Celebrates_100_Years_of_Experience_with_Columbus_S&articleid=880865, http://viralvideochart.unrulymedia.com/youtube/surface_encounters_macomb_mi__counter_tops?id=VGJx3FcNE50, http://www.veoh.com/browse/morelike/v19614992esMzfMCZ#, http://deals.yahoo.com/local-store-coupons/mer-surface-encounters–dept-home-garden, http://www.bignews.biz/?id=835928&keys=Shopping-counter-surface-Granite, http://www.businessweek.com/bios/Bill_Bartmann.htm, http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1998/b3603113.arc.htm, http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/apr2009/sb20090421_494148.htm?chan=smallbiz_smallbiz%20index%20page_top%20small%20business%20stories sell my home fast

PostSecret: PostSecret <b>News</b>

PostSecret <b>News</b>. The German version of PostSecret - PostSecretDeutsch - opened an exhibit of cards yesterday at the Tübingen City Museum, in Germany. The KSU PostSecret Exhibit opened last week in the Sturgis Gallery. …

<b>News</b> Ticker: Ozzy Osbourne, Robert Fripp, Leonard Cohen, John <b>…</b>

Up to the minute breaking <b>news</b> from the world of music, from the editors of Rolling Stone.

MetsBlog.com – <b>News</b>: Mookie and Melvin join Mets

<b>News</b>: Mookie and Melvin join Mets. February 8, 2010 at 15:40 pm · 24 comments. by Matthew Cerrone. The Mets have named Mookie Wilson as the team's minor league outfield and base running coordinator. Wilson had been the team's first base …

February 8, 2010

managing personal finances

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 6:47 pm

UPDATE: Is Wyclef Jean's Charity the Best One to Help Haiti?

There's no doubt Wyclef Jean — who has raised $1 million since the Haiti earthquake — wants to help his homeland. But a look at his personal foundation's finances raises questions about whether it's wisely managing the donations it's collecting.

UPDATE: Go here for more on why Jean's charity may not be the best way to help Haitians right now.

The Smoking Gun took a look at the finances of Yele Haiti, the foundation Wyclef Jean founded to help his homeland—and it's ugly. Jean founded Yele Haiti in 1998, according to TSG, but didn't file any tax returns until five months ago, in August 2009. And the returns filed so far—for 2005, 2006, and 2007 only—reveal that Yele directed huge sums of money to commercial entities that Jean and his business partner Jerry Duplessis own stakes in.

The most eye-popping expenditure is $250,000 that the foundation paid in 2006 to Telemax, S.A., a Haitian television company that Jean and Duplessis own a controlling interest in. The payment for “airtime and production services” appears to have been related to a telethon of some sort that Yele Haiti produced in the country—its chalked up to “outreach”—and amounts to one out of every five dollars that the foundation took in that year. The return claims the fees were “below market” and constituted the “most efficient” way for Yele Haiti to conduct outreach.

The foundation also paid Platinum Sound, the production company that Jean and Duplessis co-own, a $100,000 fee for Jean's performance at a Yele Haiti fundraiser in 2006.

And Platinum Sound charges Yele Haiti more than $31,000 in annual rent for office space at its Manhattan studio. UPDATE: A tipster familiar with Platinum Sounds' set-up just e-mailed to say that the “office space” that Yele rents from the studio consists of one staffer who works out the kitchen, at a cost of $2,600 each month paid from the charity to Jean and Duplessis.

All told, TSG says, Yele Haiti has paid out $410,000 in the three years for which it has provided tax returns to businesses owned by Jean and Duplessis.

Which makes it even more stunning that the foundation ended 2007 with a $489,000 deficit. That year it took in only $79,000 in direct public support—not much more than the $54,711 it spent on travel—and reported $503,000 in cash with $956,000 in liabilities, including a “30-day demand note” in the amount of $500,000 borrowed from a foundation controlled by music impresario Lou Adler. Its only charitable activity that year was a $270,000 grant to Yele Haiti's Haitian operation, which presumably then distributed the funds to recipients there.

When we called a contact number for Duplessis listed in Yele Haiti's tax return, a receptionist at Platinum Sounds answered the phone and referred us to a public relations firm. We haven't heard back from the publicist. We also tried to contact Hugh Locke, the head of Orsa Consultants, a firm that Yele Haiti paid $82,000 in 2006. According to this 2005 press release, Orsa is a “corporate social responsibility consultancy” that managed Yele Haiti's programs; we couldn't find any public references to Orsa independent of Yele Haiti, and the firm's web site is no longer operative. When we called Lock, he immediately handed the phone to someone identifying herself as “Mrs. Lock,” who referred us to the PR firm. When we asked her about Yele Haiti's expenditures, she said, “Our finances are totally straightened out. We have filed, and are up to date on everything.”

None of this means that Jean, Duplessis, and Yele Haiti aren't doing important work in Haiti, or that they can't play a constructive role in responding to the earthquake crisis. It does mean that, if the past is any guide, they are unlikely to wisely manage any of the money they are currently collecting from concerned Americans on behalf of the victims in Haiti.

Send an email to the author of this post at john@gawker.com.

If you haven’t heard an Apple Tablet rumor by now, you’ve most likely been living in a cave somewhere for the past year. It’s all anybody can talk about, especially since it could launch at the end of the month.

With the daily deluge of rumors flooding your TwitterTwitter stream and RSS feeds, it’s easy to become cynical about the mythical device. Why should you care about a device that has no confirmation at all of its existence?

The answer is that its potential impact could be nothing short of revolutionary. Like the iPod and the iPhone, an Apple-built tablet could not only become a consumer hit, but actually redefine multiple industries and how they do business. Here are just some of the ways an Apple Tablet could spark a revolution.

1. Publishing and Media

Let’s start with the most obvious choice: Media. We’ve covered the previous rumors that Apple wants to redefine print with its rumored tablet. While the Kindle has done a lot to bring print into digital form, a tablet could be far more suited for reading the newspaper, opening up your textbook, and even sharing notes. Hell, Wired’s already preparing for the tablet.

The simple point is that it’s easier to carry a smart tablet than 300 hardcover books and 20 newspapers with you. Apple’s tablet will almost certainly have a focus on bringing all of print into the digital world, whether the industry is ready for it or not.

2. Healthcare

Above: The AirStrop OB iPhone App. It allow doctors to check on their patients vitals on-the-go.

A few days ago, a rumor spread that Apple was designing the tablet specifically for the healthcare industry. While we, of course, have no idea whether the tablet is being made for doctors or whether it’s being made at all, the notion is very logical.

First, the iPhone is already a tool that doctors use to save lives. If the tablet can run apps, then those tools will immediately be at their disposal. Second, it has the capability to replace the clipboard by accessing digital records, making medical data easy-to-search, and having references built right into the tablet.

Healthcare is a lagging industry in terms of technological adoption, but if any company has the resources to break that barrier, it’s Apple.

3. Entertainment

Entertainment is another industry that could be immediately affected by an Apple Tablet. It’s big enough to provide easy viewing for your movies and television shows. And if the 3G rumors are true, you could access that data via an iPhone app. Having the ability to view TV from anywhere is no small deal.

It’s not just the TV and movie experience that could potentially be upended, either. Gaming would get a completely new platform, paving the way for a new wave of touchscreen games, depending on how the tablet is designed (I wouldn’t want to hold the tablet in one hand and touchscreen with the other). It probably won’t have the same effect on the music industry as the iPod had, though.

4. Finance

The finance industry is a giant behemoth with many arms — trading, banking, personal finance, and investment banking, just to name a few. The tablet could have a dramatic impact on all of these areas.

Trading: Traders need to have information at their fingertips and make trades in an instant. Many use their mobile phones or specialized devices for this, but a tablet could present a lot more information and be far more dynamic. You could see tablets everywhere on the floor eventually.

Banking: Bank tellers could process information with the tablet and easily hand it over to someone else when the situation arises. A tablet would be a far more effective way of sharing financial data or even making payments. The need for paperwork would be gone.

Personal Finance: With apps like MintMint at your fingertips, managing your finances would be a snap. If tablets have a wireless way to communicate with one another, it could also prove to be the ultimate payment system.

Investment Banking: In addition to facilitating faster and more effective trading, investment banks could use them to quickly conduct research and swap notes.

The right software and the right interface could stir many financial institutions to purchase Apple Tablets in bulk.

5. Computing

Consider the big picture with this final industry. For years, we’ve relied on desktops and laptops with bulky keyboards. Only recently has mobile become a computing force, but even that is nothing compared to the computing industry.

Imagine that the Apple Tablet comes with a new type of tactile, gesture-based keyboard, something a recent Apple patent supports. Imagine you can type almost as well on it as you can with a keyboard, or even 75% as well. It immediately becomes a great device for computing on the go, an object that could be used as a primary computer if you wanted to.

Now imagine that the devices does have a few input ports, specifically two USB ports. Now you have a device that can be connected to your keyboard and mouse, as well as your other devices potentially. Stick the tablet on a stand and it’s a computer. Unplug and take it with you and your computer can come with you, even easier than a laptop.

While this was a thought exercise, this is the type of thing Apple has clearly thought about in the tablet process. If the Apple Tablet proves to be real, you can expect this type of imaginative thinking to be present in every aspect of the tablet’s design, interface, and functionality.

This is why the media and millions of early adopters care so much about the potential tablet and the rumors: Its potential as a revolutionary device is very real.

More Apple resources from Mashable:

- 5 Mac Apps to Boost Your Productivity
- Mac Gift Guide: 10 Buying Ideas for Apple Fans
- HOW TO: Create a Mac Theme for Windows 7
- Top 10 iPhone Apps as Judged by Mashable Readers
- APPLE TABLET: Ultimate Gallery of Concept Designs and Prototypes
- 10 iPhone Apps to Avoid Work Disasters
- 20 Creative Apps For Your iPhone

buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, buy mutual funds, internet marketing, yahoo, google, Online advertising, http://www.prlog.org/10512637-franchisesforsalecom-launch-heralds-the-next-wave-in-franchisee-lead-generation.html, http://www.prlog.org/10512639-restaurant-franchise-opportunities-providing-new-job-opportunities.html, http://www.emailwire.com/release/30658-New-Lead-Site-FranchisesforsaleCom-Goes-Live.html, http://www.emailwire.com/release/31568-New-Franchise-Opportunities-for-2010-Online-Tools-and-Resources-for-Buying-a-Franchise.html, http://www.ideamarketers.com/?New_Franchise_Opportunities_for_2010_%E2%80%93_Online_Tools_and_Resources_for_Buying_a_&articleid=883071, http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/new-franchise-opportunities-for-2010,1100822.shtml, http://www.newsalbum.com/Read/473435-New-Franchise-Opportunities-with-Successful-Franchise-Companies-Putting-People-Back-to-Work/, http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=164465&cat=9, http://www.zimbio.com/Housing+Bubble+News/articles/7/Dr+Robert+S+Shumake, http://mortgagefraudreportmichigan.blogspot.com/2009/12/robert-shumake-fraud-report-tax.html, http://personals.szczecin.pl/index.php?topic=2.0, http://tweetmeme.com/story/339636355/surface-encounters-in-wixom-going-green-with-marble-granite-countertop-production, http://finance.bnet.com/bnet/?GUID=11076222&Page=MediaViewer&ChannelID=6526, http://www.ideamarketers.com/?Surface_Encounters_Ohio,_LLC_Celebrates_100_Years_of_Experience_with_Columbus_S&articleid=880865, http://viralvideochart.unrulymedia.com/youtube/surface_encounters_macomb_mi__counter_tops?id=VGJx3FcNE50, http://www.veoh.com/browse/morelike/v19614992esMzfMCZ#, http://deals.yahoo.com/local-store-coupons/mer-surface-encounters–dept-home-garden, http://www.bignews.biz/?id=835928&keys=Shopping-counter-surface-Granite, http://www.businessweek.com/bios/Bill_Bartmann.htm, http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1998/b3603113.arc.htm, http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/apr2009/sb20090421_494148.htm?chan=smallbiz_smallbiz%20index%20page_top%20small%20business%20stories sell my house quick

EA reports 25% revenue fall for Q3 | <b>News</b>

Electronic Arts has reported its third quarter financial results for the three months ending December 31, 2009, noting a…

Bungie saddened by Xbox Live switch off | <b>News</b>

Developer Bungie has said that's its saddened players will no longer be able to take part in Halo 2 online multiplayer ma…

Steve Marmel: The Good <b>News</b> About Sarah Palin's Hypocritically Bad <b>…</b>

Never before has there been somebody so clearly hypocritical, so obviously agenda-based, and so unabashedly opportunistic in her demagoguery and indignation as Sarah Palin.

February 3, 2010

web internet marketing

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — louiswatkins1956 @ 11:48 am

Apple Announces The iPad

  • Apple Announces the iPad: WiFi, 3G, iWorks and an E-Book Store ($499 and Up)
  • Could No Camera Be an iPad Killer?
  • Why Amazon, B&N and Co. Should Embrace the iPad
  • 5 Reasons to Wait for iPad 2.0
  • Do We Love the iPad? The Numbers Say We Do
  • iBummer: Augmented Reality Fans Disappointed By iPad
  • Open Thread: Is the iPad a Flop?
  • Overhyped, Overpriced & Disappointing: iPad? No, iPod in 2001

More iPad coverage and analysis

Mobile Web

  • The Era of Location-as-Platform Has Arrived
  • Opera: Facebook Rules the Mobile Web
  • Combatting the Hype: 76% Don't Access the Mobile Internet
  • Google Voice on the iPhone: Is HTML5 Good Enough?
  • Google Could Lose 50% of iPhone Traffic to Bing
  • How to Hack Your Android Phone (and Why You Should Bother)

More Mobile Web coverage

Announcing The ReadWriteWeb iPhone App

We're really excited to announce the official ReadWriteWeb iPhone app! As well as enabling you to read ReadWriteWeb while on the go or lying on the couch, we've made it easy to share ReadWriteWeb posts directly from your iPhone, on Twitter and Facebook. You can also follow the RWW team on Twitter, directly from the app. We invite you to download it now from iTunes.

Internet of Things

  • Using Your Mobile Phone as a Proximity Sensor
  • Arrayent Called The Cisco of Internet of Things
  • The Emerging Era of Alert Services - For Almost Anything

More Internet of Things coverage

Augmented Reality

  • The Business of Augmented Reality
  • Augmented Reality: Heaven or Hell?

More Augmented Reality coverage. Also ReadWriteWeb is currently working on our next premium research report on the topic of AR marketing. Watch this space for that.

Real-Time Web

  • Collecta Brings Real-Time Content to Any Site With New Widget

More Real-Time Web coverage. Don't miss the next wave of opportunity on the Web supported by real-time technology! Get ReadWriteWeb's report, The Real-Time Web and its Future.

ReadWriteStart

Our channel ReadWriteStart, sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark, is dedicated to profiling startups and entrepreneurs.

  • Never Mind the Valley: Here's London
  • Never Mind the Others: Here's Silicon Valley
  • Never Mind the Valley: Here's Beijing
  • Why We Need Tech Events for Women

ReadWriteEnterprise

Our channel ReadWriteEnterprise is devoted to 'enterprise 2.0' and using social software inside organizations.

  • The Elevator Pitch for Enterprise 2.0
  • Will the iPad Be as Much of an Enterprise Success as the iPhone?

ReadWriteCloud

Our channel ReadWriteCloud, sponsored by VMware and Intel, dedicated to Virtualization and Cloud Computing.

  • Announcing ReadWriteCloud, Our New Channel on Cloud Computing & Virtualization
  • Why Social Enterprise and Cloud Computing Go Hand in Hand
  • Getting Started With Virtualization: What You Can Do On a Shoestring
  • How to Explain Virtualization to Your Friends

That's a wrap for another week! Enjoy your weekend everyone.

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. I think there's a difference between “negativity” and “maliciousness.”

    Negative comments can be constructive and can be responded to constructively. If you have a user who says, “I don't like your product, and here's why,” and the tone is respectful, then it can often be productive to engage that user by asking for suggestions about how to improve the situation. Suddenly you take someone who is feeling frustrated, annoyed, and ignored and turn them into someone whose opinion matters. If you're genuinely listening, you can often turn a friend into a foe by making them feel like they are being heard.

    When you have negative comments that are malicious, your best bet is to just stay away. Then you're dealing with a troll or a bully whose validation comes from getting a strong reaction from you. You're not going to get that person on your side no matter what you do, so it's best to just let them vent and concentrate on the people who are reasonable.

     Posted by: Warren Benedetto |
    February 1, 2010 8:46 PM

  2. Dangit! Warren said it before I did! Do nothing. Say nothing. Type nothing. Close the browser and move on. That is the best response. First of all arguments and disagreements on the internet rarely end well. Second of all a lot of communication channels now are showing fractured/partial conversations. If you do respond and there is a back and forth it is hard for anyone to follow the conversation. So you and your opponents words can very easily be taken out of context later.

    The best advice : “Better to remain silent and have people think you are a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt”.

    Posted by: Patrick Allmond |
    February 1, 2010 8:54 PM

  3. D'oh. I just realized I wrote “turn a friend into a foe”. I meant “turn a foe into a friend.” Proofreading FTW!

     Posted by: Warren Benedetto |
    February 1, 2010 10:09 PM

  4. The negativity on the web has to be handled responsibly. I think organizations should even respond to even malicious comments. But be gentle and authoritative. It's all about impersonating the brand on the web.

     Posted by: Shibili |
    February 1, 2010 10:13 PM

  5. What are you even talking about? The banks are bankrupting this country, almost criminally, almost deliberately; a totally criminal series of Administrations is imposing a police state; what legal protections existed are being eroded so that Middle School children are being arrested and charged with felonies, and you jackasses, you shameful clowns in the media, do and say nothing?

    You sit around eating your omphalos, talking about how you talk about yourselves? Way to paint your own cattle car, coward.

    Posted by: kanomi |
    February 1, 2010 10:19 PM

  6. We build and manage community platforms via Tribepad our white labelled community platform and this is a question we get asked alot and one of the areas of resistance by companies for building open communities for anyone to comment etc

    Let's just face facts - if they are going to slate you they may aswell do it on your own doorstep where some modicum of control can be used - if they post it elsewhere it is a more difficult beast to handle.

    I have to agree with a previous comment that malicious intent is to be ignored or shown up for exactly what it is - we use the phrase “drown them in love” alot - this means one malicious comment can be drowned out with alot of positivity and the malicious intent is seen for what it is. Engaged community members will not put up with this sort of behaviour and it won't be the moderator / community manager that “outs” this person - it will be their peer group within the community.

    Alot of organisations use their community as their helpdesk/customer services outlet and with that expect some negative comments but companies going down the route of using this medium are seeking transparency and honesty so any “issues” need addressing just as if someone rang you and told you. Turn foe to friend to advocate is a typical life cycle of someone having their issue addressed in a professional /non patronising way.

    Posted by: Lisa Scales |
    February 1, 2010 11:18 PM

  7. I've got an interesting tale on this problem…I work in TV news/sports, and have been trying to integrate realtime feedback systems into our broadcasts. Programmatically, I can filter profane words, but not context. most of the examples from my colleagues in the industry have pre-produced tweets or comments appear on screen as tv graphics, but low-latency is obviously the ultimate goal. My thing is assuring quality control, not giving the FCC a reason to come down on me for alowing slanderous material to make it on the air.

    Posted by: Jason Salas |
    February 2, 2010 5:14 AM

  8. Nice post Jolie. At Samsung, we always try to show that we’re listening to our customers/fans/followers/friends/critics because we are and we truly care about what they want to say. While we wish that no one would leave negative comments (or malicious ones), that would be wishful thinking. So we’ve approached it in a few different ways..

    Ideally, we provide a solid response that positively answers the question/criticism. Sometimes we respond just to let them know that we hear them or we redirect them to where they can get help (ie @samsungservice). Other times, it is best to be quiet and let the community respond. In special cases, a direct response (DM, email, private FB message) is helpful to take the conversation elsewhere and give them focused attention.

     Posted by: Samsung USA |
    February 2, 2010 8:43 AM

  9. Great post!
    I think the difficulty in dealing with negative comments lies in the emotional side of things. Most people - including myself - feel very strongly about what we write on our blogs. Hence it is definitely challenging to separate oneself from the content we produce (just like the artist form his masterpiece :0)).
    So I think it is key to be able to mentally remove oneself from the situation (cage the ego!) and to really analyze how to react in each situation.

     Posted by: Nadja Specht |
    February 2, 2010 10:03 AM

  10. Here at Penn State, we use negative comments on our Facebook page as a way to make friends. Our responses are polite and friendly, we go the extra mile to find out information for our fans (even the negative ones), and if we delete a post or a comment, we tell our fans in general terms what the post was and why we took it off.

    Usually we can do this with a light touch, and we almost always welcome the poster back.

    If we get told that we're abridging freedom of speech by deleting certain posts, we acknowledge the authors, open up the comment thread, and ask the fans for comments.

    Our fans have told us they like the way we monitor the page, and we grow by 100 to 150 fans per day.

    Responding to negativity is easy to do if you keep in mind that every negative commenter offers you a way to showcase your organization and your product.

    Posted by: Laurie Creasy |
    February 2, 2010 10:55 AM

  11. As a general rule I would advise clients to ignore the first comment publicly. However I would also recommend that they reach out to the individual directly with the goals of turning a disgruntled customer/client into an advocate as well as, to determine the legitimacy of the complaint. If the complaint is valid I would attempt to fix the situation and prepare a response should the “smoke” become a “fire.” If my client needed to respond I would always recommend that honesty is the best policy, even if it means admitting to a shortcoming. Just make sure you have a solution in place.

    Posted by: Emma Whitmore-Buck |
    February 2, 2010 2:40 PM

  12. Great post and comments above. Jolie, I enjoyed your panel yesterday at Social Media Camp and love how you transitioned it into a discussion thread here!

    We wrestled with a ton of these issues at eHarmony. As you can imagine, users of paid online dating sites have — to put it tactfully — a wide range of experiences and outcomes. When we launched the Advice community a couple years ago, it quickly became apparent that the product feedback board (”Using eHarmony”) would generate the most challenging discussions. Fortunately, we hired incredibly talented and dedicated community managers who knew from experience how best to handle most of the sticky situations. As head of Legal, I was only dragged into things when they got exceptionally ugly.

    As Warren astutely pointed out, I think it's helpful to divide online negativity into two categories: Abuse and criticism. Most social media sites of any scale (such as MySpace, where I worked before eH) have an abuse team that is dedicated to containing the fountain of malicious crap spewed by hatemongers. It serves no interest to leave those people uncensored, as they are really engaged in vandalism rather than free speech, and the user community is unanimous in hating them. I'm talking about spammers, people posting hate speech, and so forth. (Unfortunately, there's no way to stop them altogether except by moderating each comment — impractical for any site of scale.)

    Criticism is free speech, and most community managers and moderators that I've worked with really get that. I think Jolie really hit the nail on the head yesterday about taking a patient, less-is-more approach rather than reacting to criticism in real time — either by censoring it or by responding in a way that can be perceived as defensive. Unless your product really sucks, for every user who rates it “one star” there will be another who gives it five stars, and the chorus of fans can and will shout down the haters in the discussion. That's certainly the case at eHarmony, where there are no more passionate advocates on the planet than our success couples who met the love of their life on eH.

    My two cents,

    Antone

     Posted by: Antone Johnson |
    February 2, 2010 3:28 PM

  13. Jolie -

    This is a great thread!

    We try to respond to all public comments at Gist, keeping in mind that people who are asking a question or making a statement in public usually want a public response.

    My personal goal is to understand a negative comment, respond to the best of my ability, and be authentic. Most people (even those who comment negatively) appreciate the response and the opportunity to engage with someone who's listening to their needs.

    Thanks,

    Greg Meyer
    Customer Experience Manager, Gist

     Posted by: GregAtGist |
    February 2, 2010 3:43 PM

  14. While I agree that less is more is often a good strategy, in some situations you have to consider the 95+% of people who are reading the conversation, but not contributing. They're the true audience.

    When I launched Blogactiv.eu - a WPMU site dedicated to discussing European Union policies - the barrage of hatred from Eurosceptic trolls was extraordinary … and very personal. Moreover, it was on their sites and forums, not ours.

    Nevertheless I felt I could not leave their comments go unchallenged, as they were saying things about the site that were completely untrue. If I didn't set the record straight, a meme could start up that could fatally undermine the credibility of the site with the other 95%.

    Engaging with these people, on their turf, was difficult. You have to be polite and respectuful, and not rise to the baiting despite the twisting of words and completely off-topic diversions. But you also have to be dogged in your determination to rebut their b*llsh*t.

    It's not an easy combination - doggedness requires passion, but you have to remain calm.

    It helps if you consciously do it for the people *reading* the conversation. These readers can make up their own minds. If you do engage with the trolls, the readers will see trolls lying, twisting words and generally spewing hatred at someone who is polite and respectful, yet sticks to his guns and the truth.

    Who do you think the readers will believe?

    Posted by: mathew |
    February 3, 2010 12:24 AM

  15. Bill bartmann, Bill bartmann, Bill bartmann robert shumake, robert shumake

    <b>News</b> Corp. Murdoch: Content Is Not Just King, It's The Emperor <b>…</b>

    During <b>News</b> Corp.'s earnings call, a triumphant Rupert Murdoch asked listeners to pardon his lack of humility, but he boasted that the company's “content is not just king, it's the emperor of all things electronic. …

    The Blurry Lines of Animated '<b>News</b>' | Pamela Boykoff | Voices <b>…</b>

    It's after 7 pm at Next Media's offices in Taipei, and the day's <b>news</b> starts coming to life: Artists lift details from <b>news</b> photos while actors in motion sensor suits re-create action sequences of stories making headlines.

    Still Rolling: Fox <b>News</b> Has Its Best January Ever | TV | Mediaite

    Fox <b>News</b> had its best January in the history of the network, and was the only cable <b>news</b> network to grow year-to-year. FNC also had the top 13 programs on cable <b>news</b> in total viewers for the fifth month in a row, and the top 13 programs …

    Cave Web Works | SEO | SMO | Internet Marketing - portfolio_avenel by Cave Web Works | SEO | SMO | Internet Marketing

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress